History
Equator holds a 30% participating interest in each of the highly prospective deep water blocks, OPL 323 and OPL 321.
Equator and its bidding group won the blocks in the Nigerian 2005 licensing round with bids comprising signature bonuses (US$161.7 million net), work programmes and level of local content. However, the Korean National Oil Corporation (‘KNOC’) exercised a right of first refusal and was awarded a 60% interest in the blocks and was appointed operator. Equator’s main bidding partner, ONGC Videsh elected not to participate in the blocks allowing Equator to take a 30% interest. The remaining 10% was awarded to Local Content Vehicles (‘LCVs’), Tulip Energy Resources Nigeria Limited for OPL 321 and NJ Exploration Limited for OPL 323. Equator and KNOC carry the costs of the two LCV’s in proportion to their participating interests. The two Production Sharing Contracts (‘PSC’s’) were signed with the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (‘NNPC’) on 10 March 2006. Equator signed the Joint Operating Agreements with the other participants on 7 June 2007.
In August 2007, the Company executed a farm-out agreement for a 20% interest in OPL 323 with BG Exploration and Production Nigeria Limited. The farm-out is subject to the approval of NNPC and the Federal Government of Nigeria. The Company worked diligently with NNPC and the government to secure the approval but it was delayed by what became a legal dispute between the government and KNOC.
Following a number of public and private government inquiries, in January 2009 the award of OPL 323 and OPL 321 to KNOC was voided by the government. The Blocks were simultaneously offered to the winning group of the bid round, which includes ONGC Videsh and Equator. In August 2009, judgement was given in favour of KNOC in a lawsuit that they had brought against the government parties in the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although the government has appealed the judgment, we believe that the government and KNOC are in talks to resolve the situation.
In October 2009, the government refunded the signature bonuses of US$ 161.7 million. The Company had requested the return of the signature bonuses in the previous March because, due to the ongoing litigation, it was being denied its right to explore the blocks and faced severe economic hardship. The Company has notified the government of its intention to maintain its interests in the two blocks until such time that the court disposes of the matter and beyond. This notification was acknowledged by the government.
Operational status
KNOC established its technical team in its office in Lagos. Starting with Equator’s work, KNOC developed the interpretation of the 3D seismic survey and identified several prospect horizons in a number of geological structures in each block that are worth drilling. The prospect horizons were ranked and optimum drilling locations were selected for each geological structure. The final step was to rank the geological structures and select the locations of the two commitment wells on each block. Equator took a full part in the direction of all this work by participating in the joint venture’s regular Technical and Operating Committee meetings.
The Deepwater Pathfinder was contracted to drill the four obligation wells under the two PSC’s. Drilling would have commenced in 3Q 2009. However, to avoid a large early termination penalty in light of the ongoing litigation, the rig contract had to be assigned to Addax for use in the Joint Development Zone between Nigeria and São Tomé e Príncipe. The assignment of the drilling contract has resulted in a significant deferral of the drilling programme.
Prospectivity
OPL 323 is located 80 kilometres offshore and lies in water depths of between 890 metres and 2,080 metres. A number of large structures have been identified by interpretation of the 3D seismic survey. Within each of the geological structures there are several prospective horizons. Many of the prospect horizons are supported by seismic amplitude anomalies. Furthermore, the proximity of the block to large oil fields on adjacent acreage supports the presence of source rocks and abundant reservoir sands. OPL 323 is to the west of the Abo Field in OML 125 and immediately to the north of the Bosi and Erha Fields in OML 133. Erha has proved reserves reported by ExxonMobil to be in excess of 500 million barrels and 5 trillion cubic feet of gas and, with its satellite development Erha North, produces in excess of 200,000 barrels of oil per day. Bosi, the second field development on OML 133, produces 135,000 barrels of oil per day.
Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (‘NSAI’), Independent Petroleum Engineers, made a Best Estimate of Gross Unrisked Prospective Resources on OPL 323 within four large structures of nearly 2 billion barrels of oil and nearly 9 trillion standard cubic feet of gas. The subsequent evaluation by the operator differs in detail with regard to the definition, size and ranking of the prospects from the NSAI evaluation. For example, the operator identifies five structures. However, the total of its estimates of the unrisked prospective resources of oil at 1.3 billion barrels, at the P50 level, is of a similar magnitude to the NSAI total.
During 2006, Agip made a discovery of both oil and gas in the Okodo-1 well on OML 125. This discovery had a direct impact on the prospectivity of one structure on OPL 323, located only 7 kilometres away. It appears to lie in the same channel as the Okodo discovery, which proved that the hanging wall of the common major bounding fault forms a trap for hydrocarbons and that the immediate area has sources of oil and gas and migration paths.
OPL 321 is located immediately to the west of OPL 323, lying in deeper water in the range 1,900 to 2,600 metres. The block lies on trend with block OPL 322 to the south, where Shell’s discovery well Bobo-1 encountered a significant column of hydrocarbons. It has access to the same hydrocarbon sources as the giant Bosi and Erha Fields located nearby to the southeast. NSAI assessed a large prospect to contain Gross Unrisked Prospective Resources of 1.0 billion barrels of oil and 1.3 trillion standard cubic feet of gas at the Best Estimate level.
The subsequent evaluation by the operator differs in detail with regard to the definition, size and ranking of the prospects from the NSAI evaluation. For example, the operator identifies four structures. However, the total of its estimates of the gross unrisked prospective resources of oil at 1.6 billion barrels, at the P50 level, is of a similar magnitude to the NSAI total.